|  客服中心  |  网站导航
当前位置: 首页 » 学院 » 标准解读 » 正文

MIL-STD-461E与461D的区别

放大字体  缩小字体 世科网   发布日期:2010-03-01  浏览次数:1145
核心提示:MIL-STD-461EMIL-STD-461E: DOD Interface Standard Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteri

MIL-STD-461E

MIL-STD-461E: "DOD Interface Standard Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment" was published on August 20, 1999 and consolidates MIL-STD-461D and MIL-STD-462D into one Standard. The associated Data ITem Descriptions (DIDs) are as follows:
DID NUMBERDID TITLE
DI-EMCS-80199B Electromagnetic Interference Control Procedures (EMICP)
DI-EMCS-80200B Electromagnetic Interference Test Report (EMITR)
DI-EMCS-80201B Electromagnetic Interference Test Procedures (EMITP)

Major changes MIL-STD-461D/462D to MIL-STD-461E:

  • EUT hardware and software must be representative of production. Susceptibility scan rates and the frequency of measurement system test checks were revised.

· Conducted Emissions

CE101: is no longer applicable to shipboard equipment
 

· Conducted Susceptibility

CS101: applicability and limits were extended to 150 kHz
CS109: measurement procedures were revised
CS114: limits were revised
CS115: applicability was revised for several equipment classes
CS116: measurement procedures were revised;
applicability was revised for several equipment classes
 

· Radiated Emissions

RE101: the 50 cm requirement was deleted; limits are more stringent
RE102: limits were revised for submarine equipment
 

· Radiated Susceptibility

RS101: limits were revised for Navy applications; added an alternative test using the Helmholtz coil
RS103: added use of mode-tuned reverberation chambers above 200 MHz
RS105: limits were revised for consistency with IEC Standards
 
 
  来源:世科网
文章出自: 世科网
本文网址: http://www.cgets.net/college/show-1359.html

声明:

1、本网转载作品目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。

2、凡来源注明“世科网”的所有作品,版权均属世科网所有,未经本网授权,不得转载使用。

3、如涉及作品内容、版权和其它问题,请在30个工作日内与本网联系,我们将在第一时间处理!

 
[ 学院搜索 ]  [ ]  [ 告诉好友 ]  [ 打印本文 ]  [ 关闭窗口 ]

 
0条 [查看全部]  相关评论